Studying law as a student. Again.
It should be familiar ground. Except it isn't. Points of departure from my LL.B experience:
Being treated like an adult - no insults, no passive-aggressive sarcasm during recitation ("seminar discussions"). One can be wrong about the fact of a case, the reasoning of the court and still be treated with baseline human decency. You're not protected from consequences to your grade though - that's what being an adult means.
A more reasonable reading load - 2-3 readings per session. Relevant snippets of select cases are already baked into the articles (or distributed in digest form in the teachers' notes), and the selection of cases is thoughtful enough to give you meaningful pattern recognition.
Research orientation - I have my own Westlaw, Lexis Nexis, accounts, and they're not tied to the university's IP address so I can use them anywhere. The program emphasises that the classes are just entry points and that you have to dig deeper on your own - lots of references to "additional readings" in the outlines. And then there's the overarching goal of producing a master's thesis - which is counted more than any subject (or any quarter) of the school year.